PhD Activities Autumn 2026

Below you will find our schedule for the Winchester School of Art PhD weekly meetings, which will generally run from 2-4pm on Wednesdays, in person (PGR Office at WSA) and on MS Teams. The series consists of (guest) speakers, workshops, trainings, and other research- and practice-led events.

The working schedule will be updated here regularly.

For other Faculty and University wide events please see the central University events calendar: https://events.soton.ac.uk/ 

PhD Seminars will resume on 7th October 2026, but don’t forget to catch The Playful Monster conference, coordinated by WSA PGR Ruikang Wu, which will run in person and online Thursday 24 September and Friday 25 September 2026.

TUE WED THU
October 7 October 14:00-16:00 PhD Social and Town Hall – discussing important business for the coming year [hybrid], PGR Meeting Room (East 3024) and online.

INDUCTION AND CAMPUS TOUR FOR NEW PGRs IMMEDIATELY BEFOREHAND.

14 October 14:00-16:00 Radical Friendship Reading Group / Workshop with Marie Theresa, Mara González González and Marina Castledine, building on from Japan partnership activities in 2025-26 [hybrid], PGR Meeting Room (East 3024) and online.
Tuesday 20 October PhD Crit (TBC) 21 October 14:00-16:00, The Great PhD Infrastructure Troubleshoot 2026 (talking about and taking questions on university systems from Pure to PGR Manager) with Megen de Bruin-Molé [hybrid], PGR Meeting Room (East 3024) and online.
28 October 14:00-16:00, WEDNESDAY MAKING / NO FORMAL SESSION
November 4 November 14:00-16:00, Life After the PhD: Joint Session with Early Career Colleagues [hybrid], PGR Meeting Room (East 3024) and online.
11 November 14:00-16:00, Progression Review Preparation with Megen de Bruin-Molé [hybrid], PGR Meeting Room (East 3024) and online. 
Tuesday 17 November PhD Crit (TBC) 18 November 14:00-16:00, WEDNESDAY MAKING / NO FORMAL SESSION
25 November 14:00-16:00, WEDNESDAY MAKING / NO FORMAL SESSION
December 2 December, Potential PhD Symposium day
PhD Crit (TBC) 9 December, Potential PhD Symposium day

Winter graduation will take place between Tuesday 15 – Thursday 17 December 2026. After graduation we traditionally have a PhD social. This TBC pending the exact date and location of WSA graduation ceremony.

The winter closure period will be 24 December 2026 to Sunday 3 January 2027 (teaching and some university services will be suspended).

PhD Seminars will resume in late January or early February 2027.

The Playful Monster (Conference, 24-25 September 2026)

Monsters are often figured as objects of fear, disgust, and threat. Yet monsters can also be playful, pleasurable, cute, and comforting. Join us and explore how the monstrous becomes playful across games, media, and everyday culture, and what happens where horror, games, toys, and
play meet!

Thursday 24 and Friday 25 September 2026
British Summer Time (BST, UTC+1)

Winchester School of Art, Harvard Lecture Theatre (63A / East Building, Level 3) and MS Teams. Full programme below.

Thursday 24 September — Harvard Lecture Theatre (WSA 63A / East Building, Level 3) and Online

09:30–10:00  Welcome and opening

10:00–11:00  Keynote Address

Ewan Kirkland

Monstrosity and Modernity: Contained, Categorised and Captured Monsters in Video Games

10:00–10:40 Presentation  |  10:40–11:00 Audience Q&A

11:00–11:30  Tea break

11:30–12:45  Horror Icons, Nostalgia and Monstrous Attachment

11:30–11:45  David Edwards — How Mother’s Boy Jason Reinvented Himself to Be the Horror Genre’s Cosy Companion

11:45–12:00  Gabi Garcia — How You Never Outgrow Vampires: Childhood Media, Nostalgia, and the Affective Afterlife of the Vampiric Figure

12:00–12:15  Jordi Martín Pons — Why We Keep Monsters Close: Bes, Grogu, and the Affective Life of Grotesque Bodies

12:15–12:45  Panel discussion and audience Q&A

 

13:00–14:00  Lunch

 

14:00–15:15  Monstrous Play, Performance and Desire

14:00–14:15  Ruikang Wu — Ludic Zombie: The Playful Monster

14:15–14:30  Anna Mangnus — Collaborative Fear: Horror, Performance, and the Pleasures of Terror in Tabletop Role-Playing Games

14:30–14:45  Klemens Franz — Beyond Monster Combat: Ludic Structures of Monstrosity in Analogue Games

14:45–15:15  Panel discussion and audience Q&A

15:30–16:00  Tea break

16:00–16:50  Locating Monsters: Code and Liminal Space

16:00–16:15  Samuel Pegg — “It’s There! But Where?” The Monster Under the Code and the Hunt for AI

16:15–16:30  Amonie Song — The Relief of Being Hunted: Monsters as Locators in Liminal-Space Horror

16:30–16:50  Panel discussion and audience Q&A

Friday 25 September — Online

09:30–11:00  Monstrous Bodies, Childhood and Material Culture

09:30–09:45  Jacinta Dietrich and Tess Ezzy — Monstrous Children: The Monster as Neuronormative Transgression

09:45–10:00  Tianni Xu — Topophilia, Topophobia, and Monstrous Embodiment: The Kowloon Walled City in Paranormal HK

10:00–10:15  Ece Arıhan and Balım İslamoğlu — Cute Has Teeth: Fugglers and the Semiotics of Kimo-Kawaii

10:15–10:30  Dalia Mostafa Abdulrahman — Playable Death: Mummies, Safe Corpses, and Children’s Literature

10:30–11:00  Panel discussion and audience Q&A

11:00–11:15  Tea break

11:15–12:30  Game Systems, Miniatures and Playable Monstrosity

11:15–11:30  Wenqing Nan (Selina) — Growing Decay in Your Palm: Playing with Nurgle Monsters from Warhammer 40,000

11:30–11:45  Yaraslau I. Kot — Interactive Exorcism: The Grotesque Transformation of Aggressors into Playful Monsters and Monster Metaphors as Trauma Processing in Ukrainian Wartime Games

11:45–12:00  Thomas Apperley, Will Hill, Ville Kankainen, Jukka Särkijärvi and Ian Sturrock — The Art of the Monstrous: The Divided Visual Cultures of Early Tabletop Role-Playing Games

12:00–12:30  Panel discussion and audience Q&A

 

12:30–13:30  Lunch

 

13:30–15:00  Digital Horror, Intimacy and the Uncanny

13:30–13:45  Jiang Luyin — Why We Need the Monster at Arm’s Length: Playful Intimacy and the Afterlife of Horror

13:45–14:00  Christina Fawcett — Cozy Horror and Playing the Uncanny

14:00–14:15  Gregory Blomquist — Confronting the Unknowable: The Reapers and Sublime Monstrosity in Mass Effect

14:15–14:30  Elena Martín-Gil — Enemies to Lovers: Evolution of Vampire Tropes and Emergence of the Charismatic Vampire

14:30–15:00  Panel discussion and audience Q&A

15:00–15:15  Tea break

15:15–16:45  Domestic Monsters: Family, Desire and Affect

15:15–15:30  Kristine Ask and collaborators — Fear, Thirst, and Fan Culture: The Erotic Appeal of Game Monsters

15:30–15:45  Scott Ennis — From Closure to Play: The Emergence of the Playful Monster in Modern Children’s Literature

15:45–16:00  Noah Borgen — Playing Angry Dad: Dysregulated Fatherhood, Safe Fear, and the Family Practice of Declawed Reactivity

16:00–16:15  Phoebe Santillan — When Monsters Become Desirable: Erotic Attraction and the Pleasures of the Monstrous

16:15–16:45  Panel discussion and audience Q&A


Please contact conference organiser Ruikang Wu with any questions: rw1m22@soton.ac.uk

Second wave practice research: managing the institutionalisations of tacit knowledge (12 November 2025)

On 12 November, the WSA PhD Seminar is excited to welcome Dr Rachel Hann (Northumbria University, Newcastle), who has extensive experience with practice-based research across Fine Art, Design, and Fashion/Textiles.

Dr Hann’s talk will be on ‘Second wave practice research: managing the institutionalisations of tacit knowledge’ The main concern of what Dr Hann proposes as the ‘first wave’ of Practice Research was to win the right to conduct research through practice from the administrators (university management, HEFCE). The end game of this perspective was, she argues, that it sustains a culture where Practice Research is conducted for the purpose of administration: for evidencing an individual’s research profile to be assessed holistically, by exercises such as the REF. We now need to move beyond the administrative focus of Practice Research, however. Dr Hann is part of a movement suggesting a ‘second wave’ of arts research practice. This talk and subsequent discussion will lay out some strategies and examples for managing the institutionalisations of tacit knowledge, and skills for navigating a practice-based PhD within these institutions.

Dr. Rachel Hann is Associate Professor in Performance and Design at Northumbria University, Newcastle (UK). She researches material cultures of scenography, transness, and climate crisis. Rachel is the author of Beyond Scenography (Routledge 2019) and co-founder of the research network Critical Costume. From 2024-2025, she was PI for an AHRC Fellowship entitled Trans Performance Now. Rachel is also a former Chair of the Theatre and Performance Research Association, a member of the AHRC Peer Review College, and a curator for the Prague Quadrennial 2027. Rachel has examined 11 PhDs as external and supervised 11 to completion.

This session will take place in person in the PhD Common Room (WSA East Side 3024) and online. 

Medical Technology UK 2025: A Report by Hongrui Zhang, Post-graduate Researcher in E-Textile Innovation


We are pleased to share an exciting update from Hongrui Zhang, a first-year Ph.D. researcher at Winchester School of Art. Hongrui attended the prestigious Medical Technology UK 2025 exhibition in Coventry, where Hongrui explored cutting-edge developments in medical device innovation and sustainability. 


Hi, this is Hongrui Zhang, a first-year Ph.D. student in Design (E-textile Innovation Lab). With the support of the Winchester School of Art and my supervisor Professor Kai Yang. I had the opportunity to attend the Medical Technology UK 2025 exhibition, held on March 12-13 at the Coventry Building Society Arena, Coventry, England. This premier event presented the latest advancements in medical device design, development, and manufacturing. The event featured over 130 specialist suppliers, and a series of comprehensive learning programs such as the Women in MedTech Forum and Plastics & Sustainability in Healthcare, providing valuable insights into emerging trends in healthcare technology. During the exhibition, I actively engaged in learning about the latest industry developments and establishing connections with potential collaborators in both academia and industry. The networking opportunities provided interactions with key specialists in medical technology, fostering potential collaborations and knowledge exchange to enhance the development of sustainable e-textile electrodes as my project focuses on.

One of the key highlights of this event was the advancement in materials for medical applications, particularly in the realm of wearable technology and e-textiles. As my project, “Development of Sustainable and Wearable E-Textiles for Electrotherapy,” focuses on fabricating skin-friendly, sustainable, and high-performance electrodes, the exhibition provided a unique opportunity to explore relevant innovations in material science, electrode design, and manufacturing techniques. During the event, I had engaging discussions with multiple medical representatives such as Polymer Systems Technology UK Ltd, where they showed me their latest products for developing advanced medical silicone materials. This interaction inspired my research, particularly in enhancing the design and fabrication of silicone-based electrodes.

The exhibition also showcased cutting-edge solutions for medical device sustainability, a critical aspect of my research. With a focus on recyclable materials, eco-friendly fabrication processes, and long-term usability, discussions with industry experts provided insights into reducing environmental impact in healthcare applications. A particularly insightful part of the learning program, Plastics & Sustainability in Healthcare: Focus on Design & Development Options, discussed the adoption of biodegradable materials, energy-efficient manufacturing processes, and circular economy approaches in medical device production. However, I also realized that sustainability in healthcare still has a long way to go, as medical materials account for only a small fraction of overall material usage, and much of the effort has yet to become a reality. This awareness reinforced the significance of my research, giving me greater motivation to contribute to this field.

From left to right are: Customized pot for silicone rubber inks, Speed mixer for ink preparation, and Extruder for 3D-printable inks
Slides from the learning program Plastics & Sustainability in Healthcare: Focus on Design & Development Options

Overall, Medical Technology UK 2025 was highly beneficial to my research, offering exposure to state-of-the-art advancements and reinforcing the importance of sustainable and innovative solutions in healthcare applications. The event not only broadened my knowledge of material innovations and industry trends but also provided an excellent platform to reflect on the broader implications of my work in the real-world healthcare landscape.

PhD research and practice featured at transmediale festival in Berlin

WSA PhD researchers Yaqian Lai, Alejandro Limpio Gonzalez, and Katya Sivers presented their research and practice as part of this year’s transmediale festival.

transmediale is an annual festival that brings together international artists, researchers, activists, and thinkers with the goal of developing new outlooks on our technological era through the entanglement of different genres and curatorial approaches. In the course of its history, transmediale has grown from its beginnings as VideoFilmFest to one of the most important events for art and digital culture worldwide.

At the festival Yaqian Lai and Alejandro Limpio Gonzalez contributed to the ‘Structures of Haunting’ workshop, alongside colleagues from WSA’s department of Art and Media Technology and elsewhere. Yaqian’s project explores the formation of spatial knowledge on digital maps through the lens of experimental cartographic practices in contemporary visual media, and in her presentation she played with the idea of an atlas as a visual method of divination. Alejandro approaches ocean observation from an anthropological perspective, looking at networked images, online platforms, machine vision and artificial intelligence as key elements through which the ocean becomes a visual space in contemporary science and environmental governance. Presenting as part of Ocean Matter Studio, his contribution included a video art piece called ‘Haunted Wire’, exploring the cultural imagination sustaining the deep sea as space.

Katya Sivers, whose research and practice explores the critical potential of technology and visual art, also produced and presented work at PhD workshops hosted by the Digital Aesthetics Research Center (Aarhus University). Under the title everything is a matter of distance, the DARC workshops ‘related to the temporalities of always-on and FOMO, to the aesthetics as ways of sensing distance and proximity, and to the possibilities for resistance and critique’. The participants produced a peer-reviewed newspaper of their work, as well as a series of presentations and readings at the festival.

This series of events formed part of an extended collaboration between transmediale and the Critical Infrastructures and Image Politics research group at Winchester School of Art (University of Southampton), which is planned to continue with future iterations of the festival.

PhD Seminar Series Autumn 2023

The Winchester School of Art PhD Seminar Series will be resuming from today (4th October).

We invite you to join us for future instalments in the Seminar Series, which will run from 2-4pm on Wednesdays during term time, in person (PGR Room) and on MS Teams. The series consists of (guest) speakers, workshops, trainings, and other research- and practice-led events.

The full schedule for the Autumn 2023 term is available below (details and bios for individual sessions will be linked as available):

4 October 2023
In this opening week we will be running a Meet & Greet between incoming and current PhD researchers, and colleagues in the department (with refreshments).

11 October 2023
Dr Chris Müller
‘Laughing with Machines’
(workshop)

18 October 2023
Dr Sasha Anikina
‘Animist Infrastructures: Bots, Net-Works and Imagining a (Socialist) AI’
(artist talk + workshop)

25 October 2023
Dr Seth Giddings
‘Toy Theory’
(talk + discussion of academic publishing)

1 November 2023
Dr Kai Syng Tan
‘Tentacular Networking: Making Meaningful Entanglements’
(talk + discussion)

Followed by Halloween party from 4pm! With refreshments.

8 November 2023
Ink Yijie Gao
‘Researching Robots’
(live robot demo and research test)

15 November 2023
Anurita Chandola
‘Speculative Textiles + Building a Martian House’
(artist talk + discussion)

22 November 2023
Dr Shan Wang
‘User experiences in design, interactive design, and inclusive design’
(research talk + discussion)

29 November 2023
Dave Gibbons
‘Developing a PhD research question with Dave Gibbons’
(art/research talk + discussion)

6 December 2023
Julia Vogl
‘Art and/as Social Practice’
(artist talk + discussion)

13 December 2023
Dr Lexi Webster + Dr Sonia Moran Panero
‘Empathetic Peer Review’
(training and talk co-hosted with ECR Development Series)

Followed by Christmas party from 4pm! With refreshments.

Absurdity, Absurdity, and Absurdity

Dave Ball, currently pursuing a practice-based PhD at Winchester School of Art, presented ‘Absurdity, Absurdity, and Absurdity‘ as part of Conversas series at Schillerpalais, Berlin, 29 Nov 2017. The following are his reflections on the event.

Conversas
 is a regular series of thematically diverse talks held with the aim of creating discussion and dialogue, where audience members are encouraged to interrupt and ask questions, and presenters are warned against preparing “too tightly”. I decided, therefore, not to give a conventionally coherent presentation of my work or my PhD research, but instead treat the event as a public testing-ground for some of the more speculative elements emerging out of my research into absurdity.

The plan was to present a series of examples of what I’d identified as eight variants of absurdity observable in works of contemporary art. Since those categorisations were, to a degree, based on my own intuitive assertions about what would or wouldn’t constitute “absurdity”, I was very keen to test them out publicly.

The talk began with a short screening of one of my own video works, which was greeted appreciatively, followed by a brief introduction to my research. As soon as the presentation turned to the work of other artists, however, the atmosphere in the room became unexpectedly heated. In fact, the very first slide shown (a photo by Thomas Ruff of a man inelegantly attempting a handstand on a leather chair, legs flailing in the air) received an immediate rebuttal that “Why shouldn’t we do handstands on chairs? Why is that absurd? That’s so conservative!”


In fact, almost every slide I showed initiated some tirade or other on what various audience members seemed to consider an affront to their intelligence, their outlook on life, or at least their conception of art. My gentle conceptual enquiry into whether or not the works could be considered absurd was frequently met with an impassioned and resounding “no!” Whist some of these protestations could easily be dealt with through reasoned argumentation or clarification of concepts, others unearthed genuinely fertile grounds for further investigation. But what took me completely by surprise was the level of passion, conviction, and emotion with which the audience responded to the topic. Absurdity, as was repeatedly made clear, really matters – and not just to this particular PhD researcher…

AMT Reading Group

Archaeologies of Media and Technology (AMT) research group has started organizing a reading group on media theory. The reading group had its first meeting in October with the aim of initiating a lively forum for discussion amongst students and faculty whose interests overlap with AMT. The research group itself—an office for theoretical and practice-based work in media, design and art, in relation to both contemporary culture and cultural heritage—had its inaugural conference, Future Past Tense, earlier the same month.

We meet at the PhD room in Winchester campus fortnightly to discuss selected texts that relate to themes and topics, concepts and issues in contemporary media theory. The work range from German media theory to new materialism, from issues of power and politics to the role technologies play informing what is produced as material reality.

Some of the first sessions had a particular emphasis on the theorisation of ‘cultural techniques,’ with a couple meetings dedicated to explore the writings of some of the key theorists of the area: Bernhard Siegert, Cornelia Vismann and Geoffrey Winthrop-Young. The discussions revolved around the limits of such conceptualisation in analysing the emergence of objects and processes in contemporary media culture.

We also convened a seminar in collaboration with the PhD studio week to address “critical technical practice” and discuss current approaches to media and art research from a practice-based perspective. It involved issues around making and unmaking and the questions of media technologies as epistemological and aesthetic frameworks. A range of relevant art practices and projects (such as art group YoHa and Critical Engineers) were discussed, as well as the work of the participants. Michael Dieter’s ‘The Virtues of Critical Technical Practice’ was the key text for this workshop.

Recently, we have been increasingly occupied with the problems surrounding life and politics in the present: thinking, writing and making about/with media and technology in the midst of ecological catastrophe. The first port of call in this journey was Donna J. Haraway’s recent book Staying with the Trouble: Making Kin in the Chthulucene, which will inform coming meetings.

AMT directors Jussi Parikka and Ryan Bishop have been collaborating closely with Berlin based digital media arts festival transmediale. A product of this dialogue is the reader, across & beyond, which has been published to mark the 30th anniversary of the festival. The books is edited by the directors of AMT with transmediale’s Kristoffer Gansing and Elvia Wilk. We will engage with the articles, as well as artworks, that reside in this book in the coming sessions.

 

If you are interested in the reading group, please contact us:

Jussi Parikka / j.parikka@soton.ac.uk

Yiğit Soncul / yigit.soncul@soton.ac.uk

Webpage: http://www.southampton.ac.uk/amt

PhD Studio Intensive

The PhD Studio Intensive ran for a whole week, between 14-18 November 2016. Situated in a large shared space (just off of the main sculpture studio), participants were encouraged to work intensively to explore their own areas of practice, but within the context of a collective environ.

Led by Ian Dawson and Sunil Manghani, who themselves were collaborating in making sculptural works, the intensive week brought together a number of our practice-based researchers: Cheng-Chu Weng, Lucy Woollett, Tessa Atton, Noriko Suzuki-Bosco, Eria Nsubuga, Rebeca Font, Elham Soleimani Bavani, Sarvenaz Sohrabi, Yang Mei, Jane Birkin, Abelardo Gil-Fournier and Jonty Lees. The areas of practice spanned widely, including graphics, installation, photography, painting, drawing sculpture, mixed media and social art practices. The studio was also visited by Gordon Hon, Victor Burgin, Daniel Cid, Jussi Parikka and Ryan Bishop over the course of the week, adding to the discursive and makerly dialogues that ran throughout.

The underlying approach to the workshop and the aim of bringing fellow practitioners together for a full week was to echo the Triangle Workshops set up by Anthony Caro and Robert Loder back in the early 1980s, which led to projects and partnerships in over 40 countries worldwide. It all began with an artists’ workshop in Upstate New York, in 1982, which brought together around 25 emerging and mid-career artists from the US, Canada and UK. They spent two weeks making work. In placing emphasis on the process of making work, rather than the product, the workshop provided time and space to explore new, independent work informed by the exchange of ideas and the sharing of knowledge and skills.

 

Comments from members of the group:

‘I enjoyed the Studio Intensive Week so much… I have returned full of enthusiasm, energy and a thousand ideas inside my head. […] I took with me, Eria’s feelings (the conversations I had with him about politics and his country), Yang’s brushwork (and her calm), Elham’s line, the shadows of Cheng-Chu, the invisible presence in Jane’s photos, Tess’s tenacity (and her immense kindness), and an unforgettable presentation and discussion of my work with everyone. I take all the comments and thoughts of that moment with me’ – Rebeca Font

‘I still keep thinking on the conversations and shared experiences that took place. It is very interesting to cohabit a space while being involved in practice-based work. Space becomes electrical somehow, with lots of interferences and thoughts sparking all around. Making practice public also exposes both bodies and ideas in a very different way, and in this sense I particularly enjoyed knowing you all in this non-seminar type of situation’ – Abelardo Gil-Fournier

‘…the Studio Week was very useful as it gave us the chance not only to create art but also to witness the creation of other art objects/projects by other artists. [It was a] week to learn/create art, explore new techniques and materials and have interesting and inspiring dialogues with other artists’ – Elham Soleimani Bavani

‘Working with different researchers from different cultures is really very interesting. We create our works with different themes. Because of our different cultures and backgrounds, we experience a fusion and collision of ideas’ – Yang Mei

‘Time, space and other artists – three luxuries that are rarely available concurrently – were offered to us freely for a week. I greedily optimised this opportunity by turning a photographic negative into an installation and by working with other artists on different aspects of my larger project, all the while building relationships with the interesting and diverse group I am fortunate enough to be part of. An excellent week’ – Tessa Atton

‘I was quite uncertain at first about how to go forward with this kind of space. I was greatly inspired by the space and how everybody went around ‘conquering it’. I think Rebeca literally did that! And the Rotunda wacky race was great. Thanks Lucy and Noriko, and for the wonderful portrait Lucy. I enjoyed the work of everyone in the workshop even if i have not mentioned names. A big thank-you to Ian for the great hand of support and for the space.  I hope to work in it again. Thanks Sunil for leading by example and being part of the whole experience. I was inspired by that’ – Eria Nsubuga

It was the first time to see people’s working process rather than seeing the result of work. While we might have been slightly nervous working with each other, through sharing the studio space any apprehension seemed to disappear. Moreover, through giving each other support and feedback, a sense of learning from each other could be seen in this context, similar to the spirit to the former accounts of Black Mountain College. – Cheng-Chu Weng

‘The studio week great opportunity to push things forward in the practice realm. Be it by creating work and projects through material, performative or dialogical processes. It was a great catalyst for discussion on socially engaged practice for Noriko using the context of the school’s very own Brutalist Rotunda. An inside, outside space which will become the focus of further enquiries. Both past and present PhDs, Bevis and Jonty joined in and contributed to the conversation. I also spent some time painting Practice Portraits of Artists in process either in the act of making, thinking or talking about work. Thanks,  It was great to work with everyone and get a dialogue going on about our practice’ – Lucy Woollett

Minimalism: Location Aspect Moment

Click for Exhibition Notes

Cheng-Chu Weng, currently pursing a practice-based PhD at Winchester School of Art, recently curated an exhibition that accompanied the conference ‘Minimalism: Location Aspect Moment‘, which was held at University of Southampton/ Winchester School of Art event (October 14th-15th 2016), and organised by Paul Hegarty, Sarah Hayden and Ryan Bishop, in conjunction with the John Hansard Gallery. 

One of the purposes of ‘Minimalism: Location Aspect Moment’ was to expand our conception of what minimalism was, where it happened, who was making it, why, and how it extends through time until now. It is clear that the minimalist impulse happened in cross-national encounters (such as the 1967 show Serielle Formationen in Frankfurt) and that Europe was fertile ground for explorations in serial works, in playing with the prospect of singular forms and systematic thinking. Admitting the significance of the naming of the idea of minimalism in the 1960s, the conference looked back to earlier versions of the reductionist, repetitive, singularising or multiplying intents of core minimalist endeavour. As a result, the event sought consider what an expanded field of minimalism looks like, sounds like.

The exhibition accompanying the conference brought together the work of nine staff, PhD researchers and alumni from Winchester School of Art. The works and wall texts can be viewed in a specially prepared PDF document.