Currently browsing author

The end of the road
.or is it?

The time has come for me to reflect on my uosm2008 journey. In order to facilitate my critical reflection, I will employ Gibbs (1988)’s reflective cycle model. This is broken down into the following phases: Created by Filipek (2018) on Canva The reason I picked this strategy for this reflection is that perhaps the road never comes to an end…I don’t think I’ll let this experience be a one-off, and I’ll certainly be blogging and learning again. Continue reading →

Digital Natives or Digital Naivety? Evaluating how to assess the reliability and authenticity of online news

Alongside being a much-loved term of Donald Trump, ‘fake news’ sparked a lot of debates recently (Allcott and Gentzkow, 2017). Background Watch my video to find out what fake news is: Created by Filipek (2018) on Powtoon As noted in my first blog post, Prensky (2001) categorized young people as digital natives. Continue reading →

Learning from others: a reflection on digital differences

After writing my blog post on digital differences, I have a lot of reflecting to do in this post… Let me begin by giving credit to my peers who’ve helped me discover more about digital differences in a number of ways: Created by Anna Filipek with Canva Something I’ve learned… One thing in particular that I’ve gotten from my peers, my own research, and the MOOC content, is that I’ve become more aware of the importance of internet access. Continue reading →

LET’S TALK ABOUT DIGITAL DIFFERENCES

Generally speaking, most of us have integrated technology/internet into our everyday lives. One study even suggests that Britons spend more time on tech than asleep Source: Gramigna’s blog (2015) It’s easy to generalize though
 So it’s shocking to find 1/10 people in the UK have never used the internet (Halford et al., 2017) when I can’t even go a day without it! Digital differences Digital inequalities clearly exist, reflecting reality. Continue reading →

The digital spectrum: where do I fit in?

Prensky (2001)‘s infamous categorization of ‘digital natives’ (those who are native speakers of the digital language) and ‘digital immigrants’ (those who supposedly can never become native due to their ‘accent’- their foot in the past) encompasses problematic assumptions about generational differences. “Today’s students think and process information fundamentally differently from their predecessors” (Prensky, 2001, p. Continue reading →