Currently browsing author

Open Access or Nopen Access?

Open access entailsĀ online research outputs that are free of all restrictions on accessĀ (e.g.,Ā accessĀ tolls) and free of many restrictions on use (e.g. certain copyright and license restrictions). It seems as though many peopleĀ are in favour of open access, as can be seen just by all the twitter accounts regarding the matter. Continue reading →

Open Access or Nopen Access?

Open access entailsĀ online research outputs that are free of all restrictions on accessĀ (e.g.,Ā accessĀ tolls) and free of many restrictions on use (e.g. certain copyright and license restrictions). It seems as though many peopleĀ are in favour of open access, as can be seen just by all the twitter accounts regarding the matter. Continue reading →

Think you are anonymous? Think again.

As the ā€œdigital residents and visitorsā€ topic taught us, most web-related subjects are not black or white. Similarly, having multiple online identities is not an absolute debate, but rather serves many purposes, given it is employed properly. Ā But what do we mean by multiple online identities? In this context, its not aboutĀ simply using different accounts … Continue reading Think you are anonymous? Think again. Continue reading →

Topic 1: Reflection

Although Topic 1 was about us dipping our toes into the blogging water, it had a great impact on me. At first I was more focused on creating a clear image of what ā€œdigital residentsā€ and ā€œdigital visitorsā€ are. I read through Prenskyā€™s, Le Cornu, and Whiteā€™s papers so I could understand their theories. What I came to realise was that the hard part was not the research, but the self-evaluation. Applying the theories you read about, to yourself and seeing how you fit the picture. Continue reading →

Topic 1: Reflection

Although Topic 1 was about us dipping our toes into the blogging water, it had a great impact on me. At first I was more focused on creating a clear image of what ā€œdigital residentsā€ and ā€œdigital visitorsā€ are. I read through Prenskyā€™s, Le Cornu, and Whiteā€™s papers so I could understand their theories. Continue reading →