Meeting Summaries – Easter Break


Although the group were not able to have a meeting over the Easter holiday (as many members were in different countries), contact remained consistent via our group facebook page where work is shared, discussed and planned. Over the holiday the group made sure to keep track of our progress on this site weekly. Below are the minutes of the updates.

Week 1 of Easter ending 29/03/2015 

During this week the group finalised a first draft of the design and engineering posts previously mentioned. These include Use case, wireframes, design theory, logo designs, activity diagram and a class diagram. For the next week it was concluded that each member would proof read each post.

Week 2 of Easter

The second draft of the afore mentioned posts were posted to the shared googledrive and each member would proof these once again. It was concluded that each member should think about how the posts could be improved and contribute where necessary. The group will email Rob updates on the portfolio progression by the next week.

Week 3 of Easter 

The group has posted the first design posts that were discussed at the beginning of Easter. This includes design theory and logo designs. The third drafts of the engineering posts should be completed in order to post them to the portfolio next week.

Week 4 of Easter 

The engineering posts have been added to the blog. The group concluded that due to other imminent deadlines each member would focus on these for the remainder of the week. For next week the group concluded that each member should think about future considerations for the product which will take place after the finishing stage of our development. This will illustrate that the group has considered the future testing and release of the app beyond the expectations that the group set out in the success criteria.

This post represents that coherent structure and story are present in the portfolio which uses the entry and tags mechanism of the blog system. It tells the story of the project by explaining individual roles clearly, explaining why these were decided, and what outcome they will produce later on in the project.

Minutes by Briony.

, , , ,

  1. No comments yet.
(will not be published)