Currently browsing

Page 15

Quality of online information

In my previous post, I mentioned about Echo chambers, filter bubbles and fake news. But that are just a small part of the whole digital world. The study of fake news fits neatly into media literacy units where it allow us to consume and view media critically (Mgongolwa, 2017). Source: Original Content Having to assess the reliability and authenticity, you will think about the quality of the source and how do we evaluate it. Continue reading →

The ‘I’ in Literacy

Today, where the media strives for our attention, it’s hard to recognise authenticity and readily put forth our seed of trust. It’s not surprising to know that even celebrities we look up to, lack the capacity to distinguish what’s real and what’s fake (WIRED, 2017). We’re all victims of the information we’re exposed to. Fig 1 explains the importance of being literate, which would also lead to better decisions made (Psychology Today, 2017). Continue reading →

Other considerations for Information Quality

With the advancement of internet, information sources are no longer limited to traditional media. Ming’s post provided an insight on the types of journalism which affects the quality of information being provided. Citizen journalism is becoming increasingly popular (Gillmor, 2004). (Source: self-produced) Citizen journalism allows everyone from all walks of life to input their opinions, hence the reader will not be restricted to just one point-of-view. Continue reading →

Be Cautious and Fight Against

After reading some of my colleagues’ great work and doing a bit of research myself, I am quite curious about the “fake news” that is commonly spread online with or without disseminators’ knowledge. I looked up the definition of “fake news”: Fake news is a type of yellow journalism or propaganda that consists of deliberate misinformation or hoaxes spread via traditional print and broadcast news media or online social media. Continue reading →

Reflection: An eye opener to the world of information literacy…

It was refreshing to read my fellow classmates’ blogs and their views on information quality. It had widened my thoughts on how the effect of poor information quality can impact not only individuals, but also the society as a whole. Kirby’s comment got me thinking when he stated that the “greatest growth of political polarisation occurs in areas that individuals only spend limited time on the Internet”. Continue reading →

Fake news! But… why should you care?

Across the blogs of my peers, there are a plethora of ways to assess online information. The ways commonly include the Author/Publisher, Relevance (Time), Sources, Content and Purpose. However, despite having similar factors, it has been elaborated in many different aspects which helped me gain the insights shown below: Made with Canva by Audrey Wesley pointed out that people love to spread false news, which I agree is a pressing problem. Continue reading →

Reflection for topic 2: what I learn

In Siew Min post, I learn the way to burst filter bubble. Before learning the concept about it, I have realized that the information recommended to me social media such as Facebook and Youtube are filtered by my click behavior and browse history. I am not sure whether it is a good or bad thing. The pros is that the filtering system gives us the information we like or at least once we are interested in. It helps to save time to search for the topics or resources we are favorite in. Continue reading →

Stepping back to reflect!

Posts I have commented on: Darren Marianne Increased Challenges in Evaluating Information Online Julian’s comment brought my attention towards advanced technology that allows video/audio manipulation. This contributes to our current challenge because not only can we not believe the news that we read, audios/videos are no longer as reliable. The video below proved how these tools can mimic public figures like Obama, and it is threatening if these tools land in the wrong hands. Continue reading →