Assignment type: Academic Critique (video)
Author: Stephanie Bowen
Argyropoulou, Z., & Papoudi, D. (2012). The training of a child with autism in a Greek preschool inclusive class through intensive interaction: a case study. European Journal of Special Needs Education, 27, 99–114.
Barber, M. (2008). Using intensive interaction to add to the palette of interactive possibilities in teacher-pupil communication. European Journal of Special Needs Education, 23, 393–402.
Bryman, A. (2016). Research Designs. In Social Research Methods (5th ed., pp. 39–71). Oxford University Press.
Caldwell, P. (2013). Intensive interaction: using body language to communicate. Journal on Developmental Disabilities, 19(1), 33–39.
Calveley, J. (2017). Gaining the power of initiation through intensive interaction. Learning Disability Practice, 20(1), 19–23. https://doi.org/10.7748/ldp.2017.e1797
Critical Appraisal Skills Programme (2018). CASP qualitative checklist. [online] Available at: https://casp-uk.net/images/checklist/documents/CASP-Qualitative-Studies-Checklist/CASP-Qualitative-Checklist-2018_fillable_form.pdf. Accessed: 14.04.2021
Downs, S., & Black, N. (1998). The feasibility of creating a checklist for the assessment of the methodological quality both of randomised and non-randomised studies of health care interventions. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 52(6), 377–384. https://doi.org/10.1136/jech.52.6.377
Ephraim, G. (1979). Developmental processes in mental handicap: A generative structure approach. Unpublished PhD thesis, Department of Psychology, Brunel University.
Firth, G. (2009). A dual aspect process model of intensive interaction. British Journal of Learning Disabilities, 37(1), 43–49. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-3156.2008.00505.x
Hutchinson, N., & Bodicoat, A. (2015). The effectiveness of intensive interaction, a systematic literature review. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities, 28, 437–454. https://doi.org/10.1111/jar.12138
Jeffries, L. (2009). Introducing Intensive Interaction. The Psychologist, 22(9), 756–759.
Jones, K., & Howley, M. (2010). An investigation into an interaction programme for children on the autism spectrum: outcomes for children, perceptions of schools and a model for training. Journal of Research in Special Educational Needs, 10, 115–123.
Kellett, M. (2000). Sam’s story: evaluating intensive interaction in terms of its effect on the social and communicative ability of a young child with severe learning difficulties. Support for Learning, 15, 165.
Kellett, M. (2003). Jacob’s journey: developing sociability and communication in a young boy with severe and complex learning difficulties using the intensive interaction teaching approach. Journal of Research in Special Educational Needs, 3, 1–16.
Kellett, M. (2004). Intensive interaction in the inclusive classroom: using interactive pedagogy to connect with students who are hardest to reach. Westminster Studies in Education, 27, 175–188.
Kellett, M. (2005). Catherine’s legacy: social communication development for individuals with profound learning difficulties and fragile life expectancies. British Journal of Special Education, 32, 116–121.
Maydew, H., & Atkinson, S. (2022). The benefits and challenges of conducting research in schools using a single case experimental design. Educational Psychology in Practice, 31(1), 89-107.
Melnyk, B., & Fineout-Overholt, E. 2005. Evidence-based practice in nursing & healthcare: a guide to best practice. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia.
Mourière, A., & Hewett, D. (2021). Autism, Intensive Interaction and the development of non-verbal communication in a teenager diagnosed with PDD-NOS: a case study. Support for Learning, 36(3), 400-420.
Mouriere, A., & Scott-Roberts, S. (2017). Measuring the impact of intensive interaction on joint attention and intentional communication using the FOCAL wheels. Good Autism Practice, 18(1), 34–45.
Page M.J., McKenzie J.E., Bossuyt P.M., Boutron I., Hoffmann T.C., Mulrow C.D., et al. (2021).
The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. British Medical Journal 372(71). DOI: 10.1136/bmj.n71. For more information, visit: http://www.prisma-statement.org/
Ramey, H., & Grubb, S. (2009). Modernism, postmodernism and (evidence-based) practice. Contemporary Family Therapy: An International Journal 31(2), 75-86. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10591-009-9086-6
Robson, C. (2011). Flexible Designs. In Real World Research (3rd ed., pp.130-160). Wiley.
Rogers, C. (1959). A theory of therapy, personality and interpersonal relationships as developed in the client-centered framework. In (ed.) S. Koch. Psychology: A Study of a Science. Vol. 3: Formulations of the Person and the Social Context. New York: McGraw Hill
Tate, R., McDonald, S., Perdices, M., Togher, L., Schultz, R., & Savage, S. (2008). Rating the methodological quality of single-subject designs and n-of-1 trials: Introducing the single-case experimental design (SCED) scale. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation, 18(4), 385–401. https://doi.org/10.1080/09602010802009201
Tee, A., & Reed, P. (2017). Controlled study of the impact on child behaviour problems of intensive interaction for children with ASD. Journal of Research in Special Educational Needs, 17(3), 179–186. https://doi.org/10.1111/1471-3802.12376
Zeedyk S., Davies C., Parry S., & Caldwell P. (2009). Fostering social engagement in Romanian children with communicative impairments: the experiences of newly trained practitioners of intensive interaction. British Journal of Learning Disabilities, 37, 186–196.