![\"\"](\"https:\/\/blog.soton.ac.uk\/webteam\/files\/2026\/10\/art6150.png\")
<\/a><\/p>\n2.<\/p>\n
3.<\/p>\n 4.<\/p>\n 5.<\/p>\n 6.<\/p>\n 7.<\/p>\n 8.<\/p>\n 9.<\/p>\n 10.<\/p>\n 11.<\/p>\n<\/a><\/p>\n<\/a><\/p>\n<\/a><\/p>\n<\/a><\/p>\n<\/a><\/p>\n<\/a><\/p>\n<\/a><\/p>\n<\/a><\/p>\n<\/a><\/p>\n
OK. So it’s really easy to spot those awful pub posters which have paintbrush backgrounds, too much stuff crammed in and “good times, good drinks, good vibes” type nonsense. And the dreaded AI “pee tint”. <\/p>\n
But I’m worried this makes people over confident in how easy it is to spot. I believe it’s almost impossible to tell if the prompt is well crafted. To this end I’ve downloaded some pictures of art by humans and generated one or more AI art items that are entirely fake. Can you spot which is which?<\/p>\n
My goal here is to make people realise that just because they spot some obvious cases that doesn’t mean they are not seeing AI generated content by more skilled prompters without realising… Or maybe, I’ll learn some people are much better at spotting it than me and they can explain how they spotted it. <\/p>\n
At least one picture is downloaded by me from the web and I believe it is by a real human<\/p>\n
At least one picture is made entirely by ChatGPT.<\/p>\n
Answers published a week from now.<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
1.<\/p>\n
2.<\/p>\n 3.<\/p>\n 4.<\/p>\n 5.<\/p>\n 6.<\/p>\n 7.<\/p>\n 8.<\/p>\n 9.<\/p>\n 10.<\/p>\n 11.<\/p>\n<\/a><\/p>\n<\/a><\/p>\n<\/a><\/p>\n<\/a><\/p>\n<\/a><\/p>\n<\/a><\/p>\n<\/a><\/p>\n<\/a><\/p>\n<\/a><\/p>\n<\/a><\/p>\n