What has been the impact of the REF results on the University in general?
The REF results are a major morale boost for the University community. Inevitably as the crucial day approached in December it was a bit like waiting for exam results. Despite your very best efforts, you can never really tell how well you have done.
Those two crucial results’ days confirmed that Southampton performed extremely well, with our leading subjects enhancing their national positions. We have much to celebrate. The University is 11th in the UK (up three places from 2008) in the important Power Rankings (which determine the funding we get). Plus we are 8th in the new Research Intensity ranking that reflects our quality related to the percentage of eligible staff whose research was submitted (for Southampton, a 90% submission).
The results confirm that we have strength in depth across the University. We have the best Music Department, the leading Health Sciences activity, and the most powerful General Engineering, and Electronic and Electrical Engineering. We are in the top 5 for Ocean and Earth Sciences, History, Modern Languages and Social Policy. 84% of our research outputs, 97% of our research environments and 90% of our research impact were assessed as world-leading and internationally excellent.
What will change as a result of the results in some of the areas that did well.
The REF outcomes not only drive the amount of QR (Quality Related) funding that we receive (currently £45M per year based on the last Research Assessment Exercise), but are a major boost to reputation. Like it or not, the REF has become central to academic lives. Where you work as an individual and how good your department is, as judged by REF, will impact on the winning of future research funding, perceived standing in the field, and so potentially impact on future career prospects. As a research intensive university, how we perform impacts our League Table rankings, and our ability to attract world-leading researchers and, of course, students.
We will not know how much QR we will receive from 2015/16 onwards until later in the spring. The Higher Education Funding Council for England (HEFCE) are currently modelling the REF results against the money available. Amongst their considerations are questions about funding for different disciplines, not least in the medical and Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics (STEM) areas.
The recent grant letter from the government to HEFCE confirms that it should seek to fund excellence ‘wherever it is found’ and suggests that the ratio of funding for 4* (world-leading) and 3* (internationally-excellent) research might remain about the same. However, as there is more 4* and 3* research across the sector and no more money to be allocated we are cautiously assuming that at best Southampton’s allocation will be ‘flat cash’.
When will the next REF take place?
The current understanding is that the next REF is likely to require institutions to make submissions in November 2019 with the results known in 2020. So, just over 4 years away possibly. Everyone who contributed to the submissions in 2013 will know that this is not long to prepare. We have already commenced work to put us in a good position to start the preparations, including procuring a new Research Management Information System.
HEFCE is undertaking much work to help inform a future REF, including gathering experience and views from institutions and from those who sat on the Assessment Panels; and completing work to assess whether, and how, metrics might play a greater role in the future. We hope to get greater clarity on the shape of the future REF later in 2015.
We are coming up to a general election, if the political landscape should change, will this make any difference to REF?
I am sure that the outcome of the General Election, regardless of the composition of the next government, will have a wide range of impacts on universities. The Comprehensive Spending Review that will follow will of course be impacted by the strength of the economy and likely further government spending cuts. How higher education will fare is not clear, although the Science and Innovation Strategy published in December makes strong and long-term commitments to maintaining Britain’s world-leading science position, including to the dual-support system and to infrastructure investment.
What is clear is that the REF, as the biggest research assessment exercise in the world, is a major means of demonstrating the international competitiveness of UK research. Data confirm that the UK has increased its world-leading and internationally-excellent research activity over the period covered by REF2014.
The inclusion of Research Impact in REF2014 is an important tool for government to understand the social, economic and environmental outcomes of university research and hence of the value of public spending. The case studies that have been generated are already being analysed widely. I am sure that Impact is here to stay!
One of the University campaigns is Connectivity. How does the REF link in with this?
The University’s campaign around Connectivity links perfectly to our research impact. Our research collaborations and partnerships with other institutions and with industry and government agencies underpin a significant proportion of our research funding and our PhD studentships. The impact of our research on clinical outcomes and health service performance, technology development, industrial innovation, policy implementation, and the arts and cultural life of the UK are all examples of how our research connects with the wider world. Southampton’s ‘we are connected’ stories draw heavily upon our world-leading research. Being connected is vital to maintaining our leading research and enterprise standing.