{"id":767,"date":"2010-11-16T22:05:26","date_gmt":"2010-11-16T22:05:26","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/blog.soton.ac.uk\/comp6044\/?p=767"},"modified":"2010-11-16T22:05:26","modified_gmt":"2010-11-16T22:05:26","slug":"privacy-politics-psychology-blog-4","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/blog.soton.ac.uk\/comp6044\/2010\/11\/16\/privacy-politics-psychology-blog-4\/","title":{"rendered":"Privacy (Politics &amp; Psychology) Blog 4"},"content":{"rendered":"<p align=\"center\"><strong><span style=\"text-decoration: underline\">PRIVACY (Politics &amp; Psychology) \u2013 Blog post 4<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Now that I feel that I have established some grounding for myself within the subjects, this week I have resumed reading more into areas of politics and psychology that can be directly applied to the issue of privacy, which I am investigating.<\/p>\n<p>Regarding politics, I have been reading \u2018Contemporary Political Philosophy\u2019 by Will Kymlicka. It was interesting to discover that dating back to key founding factors which led to Western civilisation, the dilemma of privacy rights versus public accessibility were clearly evident. Plato in his \u2018republic\u2019 predicted a society where the offspring of the ruling class would be educated in common and as such segregated from the normal family life. Envisaged as the ideal city \u2013 the kallipolis was made up of both men and women who, if they possessed the same assets, would receive the same education and have the same access to careers; with no emphasis on who would be the homemaker and child-carer in those circumstances. The implication is that both the feminine aspect of intimacy and the masculine virtue of honour should share equal importance if both genders have equal treatment, however Plato was actually scornful of emotional closeness and instead presumed that honour was all-important and that anyone regardless of their sex, would want to obtain it. This hegemony of males in the kallipolis has all the makings of totalitarianism (the annihilation of the private sector as in George Orwell\u2019s 1984). Furthermore Aristotle\u2019s \u2018politics\u2019 offers a contemporary distinction between the private family life and that of the \u2018polis\u2019, the democratic decision-making forum which voiced all the citizens\u2019 voices. However, Aristotle thought that the private domain was dull and of no interest i.e. stagnant household governance; whilst the \u2018polis\u2019 was enlightening. This preference for public over private is preserved within etymology. The word private is attributable to the Latin \u2018privare\u2019 which means to deprive, thus the notion of privacy for the majority of classical thinkers was linked to deprivation rather than voluntary withdrawing. \u00a0These epistemologies have led me to start comparing principles such as Totalitarianism vs. Democracy and Self-Determination which I will research further into next week along with further reading into more contemporary issues such as security and globalization.<\/p>\n<p>For the psychology part of my study I have been fortunate enough to obtain a recommended core text book from an Undergraduate psychology student. \u2018Psychology\u2019 by Martin, Carlson and Buskist. For all my previous psychology reading this book achieved the previously impossible! It provided me with a definitive definition of what is psychology. Therefore If I am to understand that psychology is \u2018the science of behaviour\u2019, literally interpreted as \u2018the science of the mind\u2019, it encompasses behaviour which can be directly observed and behavioural characteristics can be utilised within principles and theories to explain individual actions. Returning to the area of social psychology, in particular \u2018self\u2019 and \u2018identity\u2019, social psychologists are of the belief that people have many different selves in relation to different situations. Markus and Nurius (1986) determine that \u2018selves not only describe how we are, but how we would like to be, called possible selves.\u2019 The \u2018self- discrepancy theory\u2019 by Higgins (1987) distinguishes between \u2018the actual self\u2019 \u2013 how one really is, \u2018the ideal self\u2019 \u2013 how one would like to be and \u2018the ought self\u2019 \u2013 how one thinks they should be. Thus the first two are types of \u2018self-guides\u2019 which encourage a variety of self-related behaviours, whilst the latter engages \u2018prevention\u2019 behaviour in that we would strive to abstain from doing what may be frowned upon by society. In Sedikides, C. \u2018The Self\u2019, the theory of \u2018the looking glass\u2019 is purported (Goffman 1959) in which \u2018people actively attempt to create desired impressions or appraisals of themselves in the minds of the social audience\u2019. In accordance with this, Shrauger and Schoeneman (1979) determined that people \u2018see through the glass darkly\u2019 \u2013 individuals perceive themselves on what or how they <span style=\"text-decoration: underline\">think <\/span>others see them rather than on how others actually see them. Robson &amp; Harter (1991) also provided a theory about \u2018self-worth\u2019 being based on peer-pressure. Next week I will continue reading other seminal theories of psychological behaviour and \u2018self and \u2018identity\u2019.<\/p>\n<p>I have also read the journal recommended to me by Olivier\u00a0 -Newell, P. B. (1995). Perspectives on privacy. Journal of Environmental psychology, 15(2), 87-104. It provides an excellent review of the psychological literature on privacy and within it \u00a0limits of all different conceptions about privacy in psychology are listed and explained in great detail.<\/p>\n<p>I am also reading \u2018The Second Self\u2019 by Sherry Turkle. This book deals with psychology of computing and it is particularly insightful into how computers affect individuals\u2019 relationships, how they perceive themselves and society in general. First published in 1984, it provides a historical account of computing behaviour but also can be applied to contemporary issues and development over the past two decades. I am mindful though, of not going off on a tangent about privacy and technology at this juncture and I am reading this in order to make a link between my issue and the Web within my final report.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>PRIVACY (Politics &amp; Psychology) \u2013 Blog post 4 Now that I feel that I have established some grounding for myself within the subjects, this week I have resumed reading more into areas of politics and psychology that can be directly applied to the issue of privacy, which I am investigating. Regarding politics, I have been [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":125,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[262,263],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-767","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-politics-discipline","category-psychology"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/blog.soton.ac.uk\/comp6044\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/767","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/blog.soton.ac.uk\/comp6044\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/blog.soton.ac.uk\/comp6044\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blog.soton.ac.uk\/comp6044\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/125"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blog.soton.ac.uk\/comp6044\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=767"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/blog.soton.ac.uk\/comp6044\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/767\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":769,"href":"https:\/\/blog.soton.ac.uk\/comp6044\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/767\/revisions\/769"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/blog.soton.ac.uk\/comp6044\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=767"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blog.soton.ac.uk\/comp6044\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=767"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blog.soton.ac.uk\/comp6044\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=767"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}